January 31, 2017. Moscow, Russia.
PJSC RusHydro (ticker symbol: MICEX-RTS, LSE: HYDR; OTCQX: RSHYY)
announces operating results for the 4th quarter and full
year ended December 31, 2017, of the parent company and subsidiaries
of RusHydro Group reflected in consolidated financial statements.
Key highlights:
Record
operating results driven by rational utilization of increased
water inflows to major reservoirs of the Volga-Kama cascade,
modernization and commissioning of new power plants;
In 2017,
electricity generation by RusHydro Group and Boguchanskaya
hydropower plant has set an all-time high record of 140,249 GWh;
Total
electricity generation by power plants of RusHydro Group in 4Q
–32,384 GWh (+5.5%), in 2017- 126,961 GWh (+1.7%)[1];
In 4Q, total
production of RusHydro Group’s HPPs/PSPPs –23,118 GWh
(+4.5%), in 2017 – 95,971 GWh (+1.0%);
In 4Q, total
production of RAO ES East Subgroup’s power plants – 9,942 GWh
(+7.7%), in 2017 – 32,824 GWh (+3.6%);
Electricity
generation by Boguchanskaya hydropower plant in 4Q 2017 –2,824 GWh
(-18.2%)[2],
in 2017 – 13,287 GWh (-4.9%);
Total
electricity generation by RusHydro’s HPPs of the Volga-Kama
cascade has reached second highest result since its inception;
Electricity
output by RusHydro Group’s electricity retail companies (excl. LLC
ESC Bashkortostan divested in December 2016[3])
in 4Q amounted to 5,781 GWh (-7.7%), in 2017 – 20,717 GWh (-5.5%);
In 2017, heat
output by thermal plants of RAO ES East decreased by 5% to 29,924
thousand GCal as compared to same period of 2016;
Water inflow to the reservoirs of the
hydropower plants of the Volga-Kama cascade in 1Q 2018 is expected
to be higher than long-run average, to reservoirs of all other major
hydropower plants of the Group it is expected to be close to the
long-run average.
Installed electric
capacity of RusHydro Group, MW
|
Dec 31, 2017
|
Dec 31, 2016
|
Center of Russia HPPs /PSPPs
|
11,679.6
|
11,642.1
|
S. of Russia and N.Caucasus
|
2,944.7
|
2,945.3
|
Siberia
|
7,196.0
|
7,191.0
|
Total for price zones of Russia
|
21,820.3
|
21,778.4
|
HPPs of the Far East
|
5,112.8
|
5,112.8
|
RAO ES East
|
8,464.9
|
8,340.9
|
Geothermal PPs, RES
|
80.5
|
79.5
|
Total for non-price and isolated zones of Russia
|
13,658.2
|
13,533.2
|
HPPs in Armenia
|
561.4
|
561.4
|
TOTAL
|
36,039.9
|
35,873.0
|
incl. by HPPs, PSPPs[4]
|
27,494.5
|
27,452.6
|
incl. by TPPs and other
|
8,464.9
|
8,340.9
|
incl. by geothermal, RES
|
80.5
|
79.5
|
Boguchanskaya HPP
|
2,997.0
|
2,997.0
|
TOTAL (incl. Boguchanskaya HPP)
|
39,036.9
|
38,869.9
|
Installed heat
capacity of RusHydro Group, Gcal
|
Dec 31, 2017
|
Dec 31, 2016
|
JSC DGK, incl.
|
12,813.4
|
12,813.4
|
Primorye power system
|
2,755.0
|
2,755.0
|
Khabarovsk power system
|
7,429.7
|
7,429.7
|
Amur power system
|
1,243.7
|
1,243.7
|
South-Yakutsk power district
|
1,385.0
|
1,385.0
|
Isolated energy systems
|
5,707.2
|
5,335.5
|
PJSC Yakutskenergo
|
1,619.2
|
1,175.7
|
SC Sakhaenergo
|
92.4
|
92.4
|
SC Teploenergoservice
|
754.1
|
754.1
|
PJSC Kamchatskenergo
|
1,219.9
|
1,292.0
|
SC KSEN
|
42.9
|
42.9
|
PJSC Magadanenergo
|
773.3
|
773.3
|
SC Chukotenergo
|
404.4
|
404.4
|
PJSC Sakhalinenergo
|
798.5
|
800.7
|
TOTAL
|
18,497.1
|
18,148.9
|
Electricity generation
by the plants of RusHydro Group, GWh
|
4Q'17
|
4Q'16
|
chg, %
|
2017
|
2016
|
chg, %
|
Center of Russia
|
10,780
|
8,442
|
27.7%
|
46,982
|
39,372
|
19.3%
|
S. of Russia and N.Caucasus
|
1,121
|
1,386
|
-19.1%
|
6,826
|
8,239
|
-17.2%
|
Siberia
|
6,728
|
7,029
|
-4.3%
|
25,380
|
29,208
|
-13.1%
|
Total for the price zones
|
18,628
|
16,857
|
10.5%
|
79,188
|
76,819
|
3.1%
|
Far East
|
3,782
|
4,563
|
-17.1%
|
14,484
|
15,904
|
-8.9%
|
RAO ES East
|
9,942
|
9,231
|
7.7%
|
32,824
|
31,672
|
3.6%
|
Armenia
|
31
|
31
|
1.4%
|
466
|
405
|
14.9%
|
TOTAL
|
32,384
|
30,682
|
5.5%
|
126,961
|
124,800
|
1.7%
|
incl. by HPPs, PSPPs[5]
|
23,118
|
22,132
|
4.5%
|
95,971
|
94,976
|
1.0%
|
incl. by TPPs and other
|
9,266
|
8,549
|
8.4%
|
30,991
|
29,825
|
3.9%
|
Boguchanskaya HPP
|
2,824
|
3,452
|
-18.2%
|
13,287
|
13,970
|
-4.9%
|
TOTAL (incl. Boguchanskaya HPP)
|
35,208
|
34,134
|
3.1%
|
140,249
|
138,771
|
1.1%
|
The underlying factors of the production change in
January-December 2017 were:
total water inflow
to reservoirs of the hydropower plants of the Volga-Kama cascade
significantly higher than long-run average;
commissioning of
Yakutskaya GRES-2 in autumn of 2017 as well as Blagoveshenskaya CHP
(second stage) and hybrid Zelenchukskaya HPP-PSPP gradually reaching
full production capacity;
decrease in water
inflows to hydropower plants of the South of Russia, Siberia and the
Far East as compared to 2016 to long-run average levels;
growth of electricity generation by thermal
power plants in the Far East on the back of decrease in water
inflows to the reservoirs of the hydropower plants.
Center of Russia
As a result of early snowmelt in the first quarter
of 2017 water inflow to the reservoirs in the Upper Volga was higher
than normal by 2.1-3.5x times, to Gorkovskoe and Cheboksarskoe
reservoirs – by 1.6-1.7x times. Total water inflow to the
reservoirs of the Volga-Kama cascade was 33.2 km3 (normal
level – 21.3 km3). Despite the ample water inflows,
major reservoirs of the hydropower plants of the cascade have been
drown down to multi-year average levels.
The 2nd quarter of 2017 saw volatile
hydrology on the back of periodic rainfall floods leading to several
peaks of inflows. Total inflow to reservoirs on Volga and Kama in the
2nd quarter was 162 km3, close to the long-run
average of 161 km3.
Continued rainfall in the 3rd quarter
resulted in water inflows reaching all-time highs. Water inflow to
Gorkovskoe, Cheboksarskoe, Kamskoe and Nizhnekamskoe reservoirs was
1.3-1.7x of normal values, to Uglichskoe, Rybinskoe and Kuibyshevskoe
– 2.1-3.3x of norm. In 3Q 2017, total water inflow to reservoirs in
Volga and Kama was 66.0 km3 against a normal value of 37.0
km3. Monthly electricity generation by Nizhegorodskaya,
Cheboksarskaya and Saratovskaya hydropower plants set an all-time
record. The main drivers were favorable hydrological conditions and
effective management of spring flooding as well as further flooding
caused by rainfalls with optimal heads and high efficiency factor.
Precipitation in the 4th quarter helped
keep high water level in the reservoirs of Volga and Kama. Water
inflow to Rybinskoe and Kuybyshevskoe reservoirs was 1.8-2.0x the
normal level, to Uglichskoe, Gorkovskoe, Cheboksarskoe, Kamskoe and
Nizhnekamskoe – 1.2-1.5x the norm. Total inflow to reservoirs on
Volga and Kama in the 4th quarter was 54.3 km3
(normal level – 36.6 km3).
Increase in water inflow along with efficient
usage of water resources in 2017 helped the Upper Volga cascade
(Uglichskaya, Rybinskaya and Horobrovskaya hydropower plants) achieve
record production. Electricity production at Rybinskaya hydropower
plant, in particular, reached an all-time high production record of
1,576 GWh (the previous record of 1,487 GWh was set in 1953).
Total electricity generation by RusHydro’s
hydropower plants of the Volga-Kama cascade along with Zagorskaya
pumped storage plant in the 4th quarter of 2017 amounted
to 10,780 GWh, an increase of 27.7% over the same period of 2016. In
2017, generation reached 46,982 GWh, which is 19.3% higher than in
the same period of 2016.
In the beginning of 2018, the water reserves at
the hydropower plants of the cascade were 35% higher than
long-run-average and 51% higher than last year. On January 1, 2018,
the available capacity of the Volga-Kama cascade’s reservoirs was
75.1 km3 (normal level – 58.3 km3).
South of Russia and
North Caucasus
In the 1st half of 2017, hydropower
plants in the North Caucasus operated in hydrological conditions
close to normal water inflows.
At the beginning of spring flooding, the
Chirkeyskoe reservoir was drawn down to the lowest level in the last
21 years, followed by gradual filling up of the reservoir. However,
due to low water inflows the reservoir was not filled to the normal
level.
Rivers of Baksan and Cherek in Republic of
Kabardino-Balkaria went through a difficult spring flooding. Ample
and frequent rainfalls in the mountains resulted in emergency
situations in three regions of the republic. Flooding caused by ample
rainfalls brought significant volumes of debris to reservoirs that
caused periodic downtime of Baksanskaya, Aushigerskaya, Zaragizhskaya
and Kashkhatau hydropower plants.
Due to favorable hydrological conditions, the
Kuban reservoir was filled 5 days earlier than planned. The total
amount – 474.8 mn m3 – should be dispensed through May
2018 by all water users, including 10 HPPs of Kuban’ Cascade.
In the 4th quarter of 2017, inflows to
Chirkeyskaya HPP reservoir on Sulak River, the main regulating
reservoir of the United Energy System of the South of Russia, was 30%
below the long-run average. As of January 1, 2018, the reservoir
level stood at 338 m, against the long-run average of 345 m.
The electricity generation by the hydropower
plants of the South of Russia and North Caucasus in 4th quarter
of 2017 decreased by 19.1% to 1,121 GWh, in 2017 decreased by 17.2%
to 6,826 GWh.
Siberia
In the 1st quarter of 2017, water
inflows to Novosibirskoe and Sayano-Shushenskoye reservoirs were
30-45% higher than normal, inflow to Baikal was 70% of the normal.
Inflows to other Siberian reservoirs was close to normal. Unlike
Boguchanskoye and Sayano-Shushenskoye reservoirs, Novosibirskoye
reservoir saw beginning of the spring flood already in the end of the
1st quarter. The spring flood development was relatively
calm, but rain-driven floods in combination with the spring flood
caused to waves of elevated inflows. Overall flood volume totaled
30.1 km3, 6% higher than the long-run average, but
comparable to the 2016 level.
Sayano-Shushesnkoye reservoir, after the planned
draw-down of the reservoir to the minimum admissible level of 500
meters, entered regime of filling-up in order to accumulate the water
resources required for operations in winter. During the year the
maximum reservoir level of 538.58 m was reached in mid-September –
the highest level of the reservoir in the last 11 years.
Water inflows to Novosibirskoe and
Sayano-Shushenskaya hydropower plants reservoirs in the 3rd
and 4th quarters were close to normal. The Angara cascade,
like in the previous year, went through low water period.
Boguchankskaya hydropower plant was working in accordance with
instructions of the Yenisei Basin Directorate in order to provide
sufficient levels of water to allow navigation in the Lower Angara.
The Boguchanskaya hydropower plant in 2017
generated 13,287 GWh, a 4.9% decrease as compared to the previous
year.
Total electricity generation by RusHydro’s
Siberian hydropower plants in the 4th quarter of 2017
decreased by 4.3% to 6,728 GWh, in 2017 - decreased by 13.1% to
25,380 GWh.
Far East
Given hydrological conditions dominating the
rivers of the Far East during 2016/2017 autumn/winter period, and
elevated water reserves in Zeyskoye reservoir in the beginning of the
year, Far Eastern hydropower plants were operating in accordance with
regimes, established by Amur Basin Directorate. These regimes
provided for the necessary draw-down of reservoirs to pre-flood
levels and ensured reliable and safe operation of the facilities as
well as accumulation of inflows during the 2017 flood period.
In the flood period of 2017, water inflows to
reservoirs in the Far East were close to normal (inflows to some
reservoirs was 5-10% higher than normal). Nevertheless, lower than
normal water inflow to Zeyskoe reservoir (by ca. 10%) during spring
flooding did not allow to fill up the reservoir to a normal level of
315.0 m by the start of autumn, which resulted in constraints in
output of Zeyskaya HPPs.
As of late August Bureyskaya hydropower plant
experienced an increased water inflow due to ample rainfalls. During
the flood season, beginning with mid-April, the facility has
accumulated 10.22 km3 of water to secure safe operation in
autumn/winter period.
In the 4th quarter of 2017 inflows to
reservoir of Kolymskaya HPP was 2.6x higher, than normal, while
inflow to Zeyskoye reservoir was close to normal.
Total electricity generated by hydro and
geothermal power plants of the Far East in the 4th quarter
of 2017 decreased by 17.1% to 3,782 GWh, in 2017 – decreased by
8.9% against the same period of previous year to 15,904 GWh.
In the 4th quarter of 2017, generating assets of
RAO ES East Subgroup increased production by 7.7%to 9,942 GWh
compared to the 4th quarter of 2016; production in the 2017 increased
by 3.6% against 2016 and totalled 32,824 GWh.
JSC Far East Generating Company (DGK), which
increased production in 2017 by 5.2% to 24,758 GWh (75% of the
total), mainly due to decrease in output from hydropower plants.
Electricity consumption in the United Power System
of the East in 2017 increased by 0.2% against 2016 and totaled 33,237
GWh.
Electricity production by vertically-integrated
power companies in isolated zones of the Far East in 2017 decreased
by 0.5% against 2016.
In 2017, heat output by thermal plants of RAO ES
East Subgroup decreased by 5.0% as compared to 2016 to 29,924
thousand GCal due to higher air temperatures, as well as shorter
heating periods in a number of large towns of the region.
Heat output by thermal
plants of RAO ES of the East Subgroup, thousand GCal
|
4Q’/17
|
4Q’/16
|
chg.
|
2017
|
2016
|
chg.%
|
JSC DGK
|
7,985
|
8,021
|
-0.8%
|
21,029
|
22,144
|
-5.0%
|
PJSC Yakutskenergo
|
1,009
|
938
|
7.5%
|
2,487
|
2,497
|
-0.4%
|
JSC Sakhaenergo
|
29
|
29
|
-0.1%
|
81
|
88
|
7.3%
|
JSC Teploenergoservice
|
487
|
510
|
-4.6%
|
1,237
|
1,334
|
-7.2%
|
PJSC Kamchatskenergo
|
628
|
653
|
-3.7%
|
1,866
|
2,120
|
-12.0%
|
JSC KSEN
|
28
|
27
|
2.7%
|
77
|
80
|
-3.4%
|
PJSC Magadanenergo
|
422
|
398
|
6.1%
|
1,213
|
1,232
|
-1.6%
|
JSC Chukotenergo
|
119
|
123
|
-2.9%
|
428
|
442
|
-3.3%
|
PJSC Sakhalinenergo
|
534
|
561
|
-4.8%
|
1,506
|
1,558
|
-3.3%
|
TOTAL
|
11,216
|
11,261
|
-0.4%
|
29,924
|
31,494
|
-5.0%
|
Armenia
Electricity generation by the Sevan-Hrazdan
cascade of hydropower plants in Armenia in 2017 increased by 14.9% to
466 GWh. The power generation by the plants of the cascade is
dependent on water inflows of the Hrazdan river and water discharge
from Sevan Lake.
Electricity retail
In December 2016, RusHydro Group completed sale of
100% of LLC Power Retail Company of Bashkortostan (LLC ESCB) to Inter
RAO Group. Excluding LLC ESCB, total electricity output by RusHydro's
retail companies – Krasnoyarskenergosbyt, Chuvash retail company,
Ryazan retail company and ESC RusHydro – in the 4th quarter of 2017
amounted to 5,781 GWh, a 7.7% decrease against 4th quarter
of 2016, output for full 2017– 20,717 GWh (-5,5%).
The decrease in output in 2017 was driven by a
number of consumers switching to wholesale electricity purchases,
additional calendar day in 2016 due to leap year and higher air
temperatures.
Electricity output by
RusHydro Group’s retail companies, GWh
|
4Q’17
|
4Q’16
|
chg, %
|
9M’17
|
9M’16
|
chg, %
|
Krasnoyarskenergosbyt
|
3,643
|
3,970
|
-8.2%
|
12,557
|
13,580
|
-7.5%
|
LLC ESCB[6]
|
-
|
2,481
|
-
|
-
|
11,978
|
-
|
Chuvash retail company
|
922
|
940
|
-1.7%
|
3,317
|
3,274
|
1.3%
|
Ryazan retail company
|
718
|
741
|
-3.2%
|
2,661
|
2,711
|
-1.8%
|
ESC RusHydro
|
499
|
621
|
-19.0%
|
2,181
|
2,362
|
-7.5%
|
TOTAL
|
5,781
|
8,754
|
-33.9%
|
20,717
|
33,905
|
-38.9%
|
TOTAL, excl. LLC ESCB
|
5,781
|
6,265
|
-7.7%
|
20,717
|
21,925
|
-5.5%
|
Water inflows
forecast
According to the forecast of the Hydrometeorology
Center of Russia, the following dynamics of water inflows to the
major reservoirs is expected in the 1st quarter of 2018:
Total water
inflows to reservoirs on Volga and Kama are expected to increase by
1.2-2.3 in the range of 30.3-36.3 km3 (as compared to the
average of 21.3 km3);
Inflows to
reservoir of Chirkeyskaya HPP are expected close to long-run
average.
Inflows to major
reservoirs in Siberia are expected at normal levels or higher by
10%-20%;
Inflows to reservoirs in the Far East are
expected close to long-run average.
[1]
Here and henceforth performance is reported on year-over-year basis.
[2]
The Boguchanskaya hydropower plant is part of the Boguchanskiy
Energy and Metals Complex (BEMO), a 50/50 joint venture (JV) between
RusHydro and UC RUSAL, and is not part of RusHydro Group. According
to RusHydro’s shareholding in the JV (50%), the results of the
plant are reported in the official financial statements in “Share
of results of associates and jointly controlled entities”.
Operations of the HPP have been put into the press-release for
general reference.
[3]
In December 2016, RusHydro sold 100% share in LLC Power Retail
Company of Bashkortostan (LLC ESCB) to companies of Inter RAO Group.
Electricity output by LLC ESCB is for 11 months of 2016 until
divestment.
[4]
Includes generation by HPPs of JSC RusHydro, Kolymskaya HPP and
Viluiskie HPPs, part of RAO ES East Subgroup.
|